Skip to main content
Review logo

Our most academic publication offers research and surveys on monetary policy, national and international developments, banking, and more. The content is written for an economically informed readership—from the undergraduate student to the PhD.


Vol. 87, No. 2, Part 1 (Posted 2005-03-01)

The FOMC: Preferences, Voting, and Consensus

by Ellen E. Meade

In this paper, the author develops and uses an original dataset collected from the internal discussion of the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy committee (the Federal Open Market Committee [FOMC] transcripts) to examine questions about the Committee’s behavior. The data show that Chairman Alan Greenspan’s proposals, after Committee discussion, were nearly always adopted unmodified in the formal vote. Despite the external appearance of consensus with little disagreement over decisions and an official dissent rate of 7.5 percent, the data reveal that the rate of disagreement in internal Committee discussions was quite high—on the order of 30 percent for discussions of the short-term interest rate. And, under the assumption that FOMC voters assigned a higher priority to their preferences for the short-term interest rate than for the bias in the policy directive, it can be shown that this bias was important for achieving consensus, which supports and extends the results of Thornton and Wheelock (2000). Thus, the novel dataset described in this paper helps to shed some light on the internal workings of the FOMC in the Greenspan years.

Cite this article






Subscribe to our newsletter


Follow us

Twitter logo Google Plus logo Facebook logo YouTube logo LinkedIn logo
Back to Top