| St. Louis Fed | Economic Research | EconDISC® | FRED® | GeoFRED® | ALFRED® | CASSIDI® | FRASER® | Liber8™ | Federal Reserve System | Help |
![]() |
| Publications | Economic Data - FRED® | Working Papers | Economists | Conferences | CRE8® |
| Employment | Seminars | Monetary Aggregates |
|
Working Paper 2008-014B Search | View by Year | View by Category | View by Author "Excessive Demand and Boom-Bust Cycles" It has long been argued in the history of economic thought that boom-bust business cycles may be driven by over-investment (Tugan-Baranovsky, 1894; and Wicksell, 1906). But how is it possible to sustain over-investment without excessive savings? Tugan and Wicksell’s insights were to dissociate investment from savings so aggregate demand is free to fluctuate around a given level of aggregate supply. This breaking of Say’s Law was achieved through credit financing. However, a potential missing link in this line of arguments is consumption: there is little reason to over-expand production capacity unless consumption is expected to grow. This paper formalizes some of Tugan and Wicksell’s ideas into a dynamic general-equilibrium model where markets clear and Say’s law applies in the aggregate. It is shown that dynamic interactions between persistent consumption demand (based on catching-up-with-the-Joneses preferences on the borrower side) and elastic credit supply (based on collateralized assets on the lender side) generate endogenous boom-bust cycles, which are characterized by over-investment during an expansion and under-investment during a contraction. Full Text - Acrobat PDF (404k) Notify Me of Updates for: |
| About | Contact Us | Privacy | Legal | Top of Page | |
© 2008 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis