| St. Louis Fed | Economic Research | EconDISC | FRED® | GeoFRED™ | ALFRED® | CASSIDI® | FRASER® | Liber8™ | Federal Reserve System | Help |
![]() |
| Publications | Economic Data - FRED® | Working Papers | Economists | Conferences | CRE8® |
| Employment | Seminars | Monetary Aggregates |
|
Working Paper 2007-018B Search | View by Year | View by Category | View by Author "A Defense of RBC: Understanding the Puzzling Effects of Technology Shocks" The research led by Gali (AER 1999) and Basu et al. (AER 2006) raises two important questions regarding the validity of the RBC theory: (i) How important are technology shocks in explaining the business cycle? (ii) Do impulse responses to technology shocks found in the data reject the assumption of flexible prices? This paper argues that the conditional impulse responses of the U.S. economy to technology shocks are not grounds to reject the notion that technology shocks are the main driving force of the business cycle and the assumption of flexible prices, in contrary to the conclusions reached by the literature. Full Text - Acrobat PDF (491k) Notify Me of Updates for: |
| About | Contact Us | Privacy | Legal | Top of Page | |
© 2008 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis